Jim Gendelman, Portfolio Manager

January through March 2008

The International Opportunities Fund had a total return of (US$) -11.55% in the first calendar quarter 2008. The Fund underperformed its primary benchmark index, the MSCI EAFE Index ("EAFE Index"), which had a total quarterly return of (US$) -8.91% over the same three-month period.

The table below provides the Fund's longer-term investment results through March 31, 2008 as compared to the EAFE Index:

 Average Annualized Returns 
 One YearFive YearsSince Inception
(6/30/2000)
Total Annual
Operating Expenses1
International Opportunities Fund6.11%22.68%9.05%1.38%
MSCI EAFE Index-2.70%21.40%4.72% 

The performance data quoted represent past performance, and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information quoted above. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please call 888-860-8686 or click here.2

This commentary highlights Fund performance over a single calendar quarter. Shareholders should keep in mind that the Fund is intended for long-term investors who hold their shares for substantially longer periods of time. You should also keep in mind that our views on all securities and investments discussed in this commentary are subject to change at any time. References to specific securities, sectors, and industries discussed in this commentary are not recommendations to buy or sell the securities or investments, and the Fund may not necessarily hold these securities or investments today.3

International equities, including developed and emerging markets, experienced much of the same macroeconomic uncertainty, investor risk aversion, and volatility that characterized the US equity investment backdrop in the first calendar quarter of 2008. Weakness abounded and there were no true investment "safe havens", other than owning cash equivalents. All ten GICS economic sectors in the Fund's benchmark index posted negative quarterly returns, with the steepest declines absorbed by Telecommunication Services (-15%), Information Technology (-14%), Energy (-11%), Financials (-11%), Consumer Discretionary (-10%), and Industrials (-8%).

There were many factors at work during the quarter that influenced the Fund's return. Performance was buoyed by holdings in the Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences industry. These positions gained nearly 10% in aggregate during the quarter, led by Lonza Group AG (which provides customized manufacturing of biopharmaceuticals), Actelion Ltd. (whose products include a drug for pulmonary arterial hypertension), CSL, Ltd. (whose products include blood plasma, vaccines and antivenom medications), and Roche Holding AG (a pharmaceutical and medical diagnostic company). In addition, a number of individual holdings–spanning a variety of sectors and industries–contributed positively to investment results. These included: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (+7%), Nestle SA (+9%), and America Movil S.A.B de C.V., a mobile telecommunications services provider headquartered in Mexico (+4%).

Detractors for the quarter, unfortunately, more than offset those positive factors. The most prolific "negative" for the Fund's quarterly performance included a variety of holdings in the Consumer Discretionary sector. This sector, similar to the US experience, was very treacherous, with widespread sell-offs encompassing every industry group. The Fund's holdings fell by
-17% in aggregate, substantially underperforming the benchmark index's sector return of -10%. Specific Fund performance "culprits" during the quarter included Continental AG (-21%), Las Vegas Sands Corp. (-29%), JC Decaux SA
(-25%), and Yamada Denki Co., Ltd. (-24%). The Fund's performance was also singed by the following:

Currency translation had a material effect on performance during the first calendar quarter of 2008, as the dollar weakened further, primarily against the Euro. These negative effects were primarily due to Fund holdings that trade in dollars (e.g., Las Vegas Sands) or whose "home currency" is highly correlated with the US dollar. The Fund's country allocations also had an adverse impact on performance last quarter, mostly due to the Fund's holdings in Brazil and India which–like most emerging markets–had a very difficult time during the first calendar quarter of 2008. The Fund was also overweighted (as compared to its benchmark index) in France, which was among the weaker-performing major developed markets. As we have mentioned in earlier shareholder commentaries, country-level weightings, in general, are a residual of the Fund's "bottom-up" stock selection process.

The Fund's most significant sector allocations as of the end of the first calendar quarter of 2008 included Consumer Discretionary, Financials, Consumer Staples, and Telecommunication Services. The Fund's largest country weights included Switzerland, France, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. The Fund also had several significant investments in Mexico. With regard to investments in the United Kingdom, we have been focused on owning companies that we consider to be more defensive in nature. We believe that maintaining a more defensive posture makes sense, at least until more clarity emerges regarding the health of British financial institutions-many of which are beginning to address the same issues, e.g., subprime, that their US counterparts have faced. We also are monitoring the United Kingdom's ability to finance its budget. We continued to have a relatively low allocation to Japan during the quarter, based on our view that the combination of weak government leadership, lower rates of consumer discretionary spending, a generally stagnant pricing environment (which creates considerable earnings uncertainty), and relatively low levels of corporate innovation combine to, in general, create an unfavorable backdrop for owning Japanese equities. As we have mentioned in earlier shareholder commentaries, country-level weightings, in general, are a residual of the Fund's "bottom-up" stock selection process.

Sincerely,

James G. Gendelman
Portfolio Manager